The Managed Man
A much needed update to George Carlin's 'Modern Man'.
I am no longer a man in any useful sense of the word.
The old word carried too many liabilities. Appetite, grief, memory, anger, blood pressure, religious residue, a suspicious relationship with authority, and a tendency to notice when someone was lying. I have been reclassified as a service user with a behavioral health profile, a care pathway, a digital footprint, a risk score, three stakeholder touchpoints, and a personalized wellness dashboard that reminds me to breathe while selling the timing of my breath to a third-party analytics partner.
This is the great achievement of our age. The soul did not disappear in a thunderstorm of atheism or decadence. It was gently migrated into a portal.
The old world had doctors, which was already frightening enough, because a doctor was a person who could look at you and discover that your body had been conducting unauthorized experiments. The new world has healthcare providers, a phrase so clean it sounds like someone who installs cable in your kidneys. A provider does not heal you, because healing is too old and too intimate. He delivers care. He coordinates outcomes. He optimizes your chest experience after your heart has attempted to resign from the organization. If you collapse in the waiting room, you are not dying in front of strangers under bad fluorescent lighting; you are undergoing a negative cardiac outcome in a care environment where a healthcare specialist can begin an evidence-based intervention.
Medicine has become a language for removing the witness from the event.
The patient no longer suffers; he presents. He does not say, “I cannot sleep because my life has become a corridor with no doors.” He reports symptoms. He does not fear death; he discusses end-of-life preferences with a care team whose most emotionally expressive member is the printer. If the treatment harms him, there has been an adverse event. If the harm is severe, there has been a serious adverse event, which is the sort of phrase only a committee could produce, because it preserves the gravity of the damage while carefully avoiding the old vulgar habit of assigning a verb to a human being.
Death has been given a tremendous administrative education.
Nobody dies anymore if the institution can reach the sentence first.
They pass, transition, enter post-care status, or become the decedent, which makes the dead sound as if they have accepted a new legal identity in a smaller jurisdiction. The body becomes remains, the funeral becomes final arrangements, the family becomes the support network, and grief becomes a journey, which is a cruel thing to call it, because journeys usually include scenery, meals, and at least one convincing reason to continue. If mourning exceeds the system’s preferred timetable, it becomes complicated grief. Even sorrow must eventually learn compliance.
The workplace has achieved a similar tenderness by abolishing the employee.
The employee had a name, a chair, a mug, a tired marriage, and a mild panic about dental insurance. The modern company has human capital, which is a marvelous phrase because it admits the truth while wearing a tie.
You are capital with a commute. You are an asset that answers emails.
You are a depreciating unit of potential productivity whose lower back has begun filing informal complaints. Human Resources, the department named with the cold precision of a livestock inventory, exists to ensure that the capital remains human enough to collaborate and inhuman enough to be optimized.
No one is fired in the modern workplace, because firing has too much of the old axe in it. A man is invited to transition out after a right-sizing initiative identifies opportunities for workforce optimization. Right-sizing sounds almost affectionate, as if the company has discovered that Bob from accounting is wearing a suit that does not flatter him and must be tailored into unemployment. The leadership team thanks him for his contributions, which is corporate language for the portion of his life already consumed and therefore safe to praise. Then a security guard escorts him to the elevator while his laptop is disabled with the speed of a government coup.
The company will describe this as change management, which is one of those phrases that turns pain into upholstery. Nothing has happened to anyone in particular.
The organization is merely evolving, transforming, aligning, responding to market conditions, pursuing operational excellence, and strengthening its long-term strategic posture. The people removed from the building are mentioned only as affected roles, because a role cannot sob in a parking garage while calling its wife. A role cannot ask whether the mortgage will survive the quarter. A role cannot stare at a cardboard box containing twelve years of work and one dying office plant. A role can be eliminated cleanly.
The school system has joined the procession with admirable discipline.
Children are no longer children, because children are mysterious, comic, savage, needy creatures who resist abstraction. They are learners. The teacher no longer teaches, because teaching implies authority, apprenticeship, memory, and the dangerous possibility that one adult mind might impress itself upon a younger one. She delivers content. History is content. Arithmetic is content. Poetry is content.
The sacred encounter between a young mind and the accumulated inheritance of the dead has been compressed into content delivery, which makes Homer sound like a software update.
A child who misbehaves is not angry, bored, hungry, fatherless, overstimulated, under-slept, trapped in a plastic chair, or quietly going mad beneath the hum of institutional lighting. He is demonstrating a behavioral challenge within the learning environment. This challenge triggers an intervention, after which a plan is developed, reviewed, implemented, monitored, and revised until everyone involved has generated enough documentation to feel merciful. The modern institution loves the plan because the plan permits compassion without contact. The child is screaming in the hallway, but the plan is laminated, and civilization has always preferred the object that can be filed.
Technology deserves special praise because it has finally named us accurately.
Online, we are users, which is the same word used for addicts, and Silicon Valley should receive some minor award for honesty. The user engages with content, produces data, enters funnels, improves retention, generates signals, and participates in a frictionless experience designed by people who speak about human attention the way oil companies speak about untouched wilderness. There is no coercion, of course. The platform merely removes friction from the behaviors it prefers and adds friction to the behaviors it finds unprofitable, which is freedom after the engineers have finished improving it.
Surveillance has undergone the same spa treatment.
Nobody watches you; they personalize your experience.
Nobody manipulates you; they optimize recommendations.
Nobody builds a cage; they create an ecosystem.
The bars are invisible because the bars are conveniences, and the lock makes a pleasant little sound when your face opens the phone. Every movement becomes behavioral analytics. Every pause becomes a signal. Every weakness becomes a product insight. The old tyrant demanded obedience with a boot and a flag.
The new one gives you dark mode, remembers your preferences, and asks whether you enjoyed the transaction.
Speech, naturally, required modernization. A censor was an ugly figure, usually imagined with a thick pencil, a thin mouth, and a government office that smelled like dust. The new censor works in Trust and Safety, a phrase so suspiciously wholesome it should be required to register itself. Trust and Safety does not suppress speech; it performs content moderation under community guidelines written by people the community will never meet. The word “community” does heroic work here.
It creates the warm impression of neighbors, shared norms, and mutual obligation, while the actual machinery operates through dashboards, enforcement queues, outsourced judgment, and policies updated at 2:13 a.m. by someone named Madison.
Government has not been idle. The citizen, once a troublesome creature with rights, memory, and occasional suspicion, has been reborn as a client, case, stakeholder, applicant, recipient, or member of a population. A poor neighborhood is an underserved community, which makes poverty sound like a restaurant where the waiter has been slow with the bread. A homeless man is part of the unsheltered population experiencing housing insecurity, which allows him to freeze beneath a phrase large enough to keep nobody warm. The old woman lost in forms, passwords, phone trees, office closures, eligibility windows, and missing-document notices is experiencing administrative burden, as though bureaucracy were a backpack she foolishly chose to wear.
The central sacrament of this world is compliance. Compliance is the administrative substitute for virtue, courage, wisdom, patience, loyalty, and faith. A good person once told the truth, honored his dead, protected his children, kept his word, or stood upright when fear entered the room. A good person now updates the form, acknowledges the policy, completes the module, accepts the terms, verifies the code, submits the request, and refrains from becoming a barrier to service delivery.
It is possible to be confused, desperate, lonely, medicated, surveilled, underpaid, overmanaged, and spiritually starved while still remaining an excellent participant in the system, provided the forms arrive on time.
Even war, the ancient festival of bone and fire, has learned to speak like a nonprofit. Nobody kills civilians; there is collateral damage. Nobody tortures prisoners; there is enhanced interrogation, which sounds as if brutality has been given Bluetooth. Nobody invades; there is a security operation. Nobody occupies; there is population management. Nobody lies; there are strategic communications. The village is not terrified; it is being stabilized. The family is not dead; it was located inside an area of kinetic activity. The sentence survives what the people do not, and that is the genius of the vocabulary.
A civilization does not only reveal itself through its monuments, weapons, laws, or entertainments. It reveals itself through the words it chooses when it wants to avoid looking directly at what it is doing. When the healer becomes a provider, the worker becomes capital, the child becomes a learner, the mourner becomes non-compliant, the poor become underserved, the watched become users, and the dead become outcomes, the world has not merely changed its terminology. It has changed the position from which reality is described. The human being has been moved out of the center of the sentence.
The managed man can live his whole life this way. He is born into a care pathway, educated through learning outcomes, shaped by behavioral interventions, hired as human capital, monitored through performance metrics, retained through engagement strategies, governed as a stakeholder, treated as a service user, watched as a data subject, corrected through compliance frameworks, released through workforce optimization, comforted through grief resources, and buried through final arrangements.
At no point does the system need to hate him.
Hatred would be inefficient and strangely personal.
The system only needs to translate him until there is nothing left in the language that can accuse it.

I thought you did a great job with this one in calling out how clinical and impersonal the world has become